Skip to main content

On-demand webinar coming soon...


On-demand webinar coming soon...

Blog

India DPDPA Compliance Guide: Requirements, Rights, Consent, and Governance

India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act establishes a new framework for how organizations collect, use, share, and protect personal data. 

 

Madhura Sakharam Bhandarkar
Privacy Counsel
June 25, 2026

The Vidhana Soudha legislature building in Bengaluru, India

As one of the world's largest digital economies continues to expand, the Indian Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) introduces requirements that affect organizations operating in India and those offering goods or services to individuals in India.

The law presents a consent-centric approach to data protection, establishes new rights for individuals, creates obligations for data fiduciaries, and gives the Central Government significant authority to shape implementation through future rules and notifications.

For privacy, compliance, legal, and governance teams, preparing for the DPDPA requires more than reviewing the legislation itself. It requires understanding how consent, rights, governance, security, and cross-border data transfers fit together as part of a broader privacy program.

 

Understanding the DPDPA

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 received Presidential assent on August 11, 2023, and was published in India's Official Gazette on the same date. The Digital Data Protection Rules 2025 (the Rules) were notified in the official gazette on November 13, 2025, along with implementation timeline of the DPDPA.

The DPDPA applies to the processing of digital personal data within India, whether the data was collected digitally or converted into digital form. It also applies extraterritorially to organizations processing personal data outside India when that processing relates to offering goods or services to individuals located in India.

The law focuses exclusively on digital personal data. Processing by individuals for personal or domestic purposes falls outside its scope, as does publicly available personal data.

Like many modern privacy laws, the DPDPA establishes obligations for organizations responsible for determining how and why personal data is processed. However, it does so using terminology and governance concepts that differ from other global frameworks.

Organizations that already comply with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will recognize many familiar themes, including consent, transparency, individual rights, security requirements, and accountability obligations. The DPDPA approaches these concepts through its own legal structure and terminology.

 

Key Roles and Definitions

The DPDPA introduces several foundational concepts that organizations should understand early in their compliance journey.

A data principal is the individual to whom personal data relates. For children and certain individuals with disabilities, rights may be exercised by parents or lawful guardians.

A data fiduciary is the person or organization that determines the purpose and means of processing personal data. This role is broadly comparable to a controller under other privacy frameworks.

A data processor processes personal data on behalf of a data fiduciary.

The law also introduces the concept of a significant data fiduciary, a designation that will be made by the Central Government based on factors such as the volume and sensitivity of data processed. Organizations designated as significant data fiduciaries become subject to additional obligations.

These distinctions matter because obligations vary depending on an organization's role and whether it falls within the significant data fiduciary category.

 

Consent and Legitimate Uses

Consent sits at the center of the DPDPA. Organizations seeking to process personal data generally require consent that is free, specific, informed, unconditional, and given through a clear affirmative action. Individuals must be able to withdraw consent as easily as they provide it.

When consent is withdrawn, organizations must cease processing unless another lawful basis under the DPDPA applies.

The DPDPA also recognizes a category of processing referred to as legitimate uses. These include specific circumstances such as government functions, legal compliance obligations, employment-related purposes, medical emergencies, and other scenarios defined within the DPDPA.

For many organizations, this creates a dual challenge. They must understand when consent is required while also identifying where legitimate-use provisions may apply.

The operational impact often extends beyond legal analysis. Consent collection, preference management, recordkeeping, and withdrawal mechanisms must all work consistently across systems and business processes.

For a deeper discussion of implementation priorities and emerging developments, watch our webinar, India DPDPA Readiness: What to Watch Now.

 

Privacy Notices and Transparency Requirements

The DPDPA places significant emphasis on transparency. Organizations requesting consent must provide a notice that clearly explains:

  • The personal data being processed
  • The purpose of processing
  • How individuals can withdraw consent
  • How grievance mechanisms operate
  • How complaints may be submitted to the Data Protection Board of India (the Board)
  • Relevant contact information

The notice must be presented in clear and plain language. Additionally, the notice for consent must be presented to the data principal by giving an option to access it in English or any language specified in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India.

The law also requires organizations to demonstrate that notice was provided, and that valid consent was obtained. This creates an accountability requirement that extends beyond policy drafting into operational evidence and recordkeeping.

For privacy teams, this means privacy notices should be viewed as active governance tools rather than static legal documents. The information disclosed must align with how data is actually collected, used, and managed throughout the organization.

 

The Role of Consent Managers

One of the DPDPA's most distinctive features is the introduction of consent managers.

A consent manager is an individual or entity registered with the Board that enables data principals to provide, manage, review, and withdraw consent through an accessible and interoperable platform. Consent managers operate on behalf of data principals and remain accountable to them.

This concept introduces an additional layer into India's privacy ecosystem. Rather than managing consent exclusively through direct interactions with organizations, individuals may increasingly exercise control through independent consent-management mechanisms.

For organizations, this reinforces the importance of maintaining accurate consent records and ensuring systems can accommodate consent updates and withdrawals consistently.

 

Data Principal Rights

The DPDPA establishes several rights that individuals may exercise in relation to their personal data.

These include:

  • The right to access information about personal data being processed
  • The right to correction and updating of personal data
  • The right to erasure in certain circumstances
  • The right to grievance redressal
  • The right to nominate another individual to exercise rights in the event of death or incapacity

These rights introduce operational requirements that extend across data inventories, workflows, governance processes, and customer-facing systems.

For example, an organization receiving a request for correction must understand where personal data resides, how it moves across systems, and which business functions rely on it. Similarly, responding to an erasure request requires visibility into retention schedules, third-party processing relationships, and downstream data flows.

As with many privacy laws, compliance depends as much on operational readiness as on legal interpretation.

 

Significant Data Fiduciaries and Governance Requirements

The DPDPA introduces enhanced obligations for organizations designated as significant data fiduciaries.

While the Central Government retains authority to determine designation criteria and detailed requirements, the framework already establishes stronger governance expectations for these organizations.

The law requires data fiduciaries to appoint a Data Protection Officer and establish grievance redressal mechanisms for individuals.

Future rules may introduce additional obligations around impact assessments, governance controls, and accountability measures.

This creates an important compliance consideration. Organizations should not only assess current obligations but also monitor future rulemaking activities that may affect governance requirements over time.

 

International Data Transfers

The DPDPA adopts a different approach to international transfers than many other privacy laws. Rather than establishing approved transfer mechanisms or adequacy-style frameworks, the DPDPA uses a restriction-based model.

The Central Government may identify countries or territories to which personal data transfers are restricted. Transfers remain permissible unless a destination is specifically restricted through future government action.

At the same time, organizations must continue to consider sector-specific requirements and localization obligations that may apply outside the DPDPA itself.

This approach provides flexibility but also introduces uncertainty because future government notifications will play an important role in shaping transfer requirements.

Organizations with global data flows should maintain visibility into evolving transfer restrictions and assess how they interact with broader governance frameworks.

 

Security, Breach Notification, and Enforcement

The DPDPA requires organizations to implement reasonable security safeguards to protect personal data. When a personal data breach occurs, organizations must notify both affected individuals and the Board.

This creates dual notification obligations that connect security response processes directly to privacy compliance requirements. The law also introduces significant financial penalties. Violations may result in civil penalties of up to INR 250 crore, approximately USD 31 million.

Unlike some privacy frameworks, the DPDPA does not establish compensation rights for affected individuals. Enforcement instead centers on regulatory oversight and administrative penalties.

The Board serves primarily as an adjudicatory body for complaints and enforcement matters. Unlike some regulators globally, its role focuses more heavily on adjudication than on issuing detailed interpretive guidance.

 

What Makes the DPDPA Different From GDPR?

Organizations familiar with the GDPR often compare the two frameworks when assessing compliance readiness. While both laws emphasize transparency, accountability, consent, individual rights, and security, several distinctions stand out.

The DPDPA introduces consent managers, a concept not found in GDPR. Its international transfer model relies on government-imposed restrictions rather than adequacy decisions or transfer mechanisms.

The DPDPA also provides the Central Government with substantial authority to define implementation requirements through future rules and notifications.

Perhaps most importantly, the DPDPA adopts a simpler legal structure than GDPR while relying more heavily on future regulatory development.

Explore our detailed comparison of GDPR vs. India DPDPA and download the infographic GDPR Vs. India’s DPDPA: the Operational Differences Privacy Teams Need to Understand for a side-by-side view of key similarities and differences.

 

What the DPDPA Means for AI and Data Governance

The DPDPA is notable for what it does and does not regulate. Unlike emerging artificial intelligence (AI)-specific regulations, the law does not prohibit fully automated decision-making and does not establish a dedicated AI governance framework.

At the same time, organizations deploying AI systems remain subject to requirements around consent, transparency, accuracy, security, and individual rights.

The DPDPA requires personal data used for processing to remain complete, accurate, and consistent. Organizations using personal data within AI models, analytics systems, or automated decision-making processes must therefore ensure that broader governance controls remain effective.

This creates an important distinction. The DPDPA regulates personal data processing rather than AI systems themselves. Yet many AI governance challenges ultimately depend on how personal data is collected, managed, and used.

As AI adoption expands across organizations, privacy governance and AI governance increasingly operate as interconnected disciplines rather than separate programs.

 

Preparing for DPDPA Compliance

Organizations preparing for DPDPA compliance should focus on several foundational capabilities.

First, establish visibility into what personal data is collected, where it resides, and how it moves across systems and third parties.

Second, review consent collection and preference management processes to ensure they support notice requirements, consent withdrawal, and accountability obligations.

Third, evaluate rights fulfillment workflows, including access, correction, erasure, and grievance handling procedures.

Fourth, assess cross-border data flows and monitor future government notifications that may affect transfer restrictions.

Finally, ensure governance structures support ongoing compliance as additional rules, requirements, and guidance emerge.

The DPDPA establishes the framework. Future implementation activity will continue shaping how organizations operationalize compliance in practice. India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act introduces a modern privacy framework built around consent, transparency, governance, security, and individual rights. While many obligations will be familiar to organizations operating globally, the DPDPA also introduces distinctive concepts such as consent managers, a unique transfer model, and significant delegated rulemaking authority.

Learn how OneTrust's India DPDPA solution helps organizations manage consent, privacy rights, governance, and compliance requirements at scale.

Looking for a broader implementation guide? Download Your Guide to Compliance with India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) for a deeper look at governance requirements, consent management, data subject rights, and compliance planning.

For ongoing analysis of India's privacy developments and global regulatory intelligence, explore OneTrust DataGuidance.

 

Key Questions About India's DPDPA

 

The DPDPA is India's comprehensive privacy law governing the processing of digital personal data by organizations operating in India or offering goods and services to individuals in India.

The DPDPA is India's comprehensive privacy law governing the processing of digital personal data by organizations operating in India or offering goods and services to individuals in India.

A data fiduciary is the organization or person that determines the purpose and means of processing personal data.

Individuals have rights relating to access, correction, updating, erasure, grievance redressal, and nomination of another individual to exercise rights on their behalf.

The law allows transfers unless the Central Government specifically restricts transfers to designated countries or territories.

The Act does not establish AI-specific governance requirements. It regulates the personal data used by AI systems through obligations relating to consent, transparency, security, and individual rights.

Organizations should focus on data visibility, consent management, rights fulfillment, governance structures, security safeguards, and monitor future implementation rules.